arXiv introduces 1-year ban for authors failing to verify LLM text

ArXiv, a leading open preprint repository used by researchers worldwide, announced a policy that could result in a one-year ban for authors who submit papers containing clear evidence that they did not verify text generated by large language models. The change was outlined Thursday by Thomas Dietterich, chair of the repository’s computer science section, as ArXiv moves to curb what it characterizes as low-quality or misleading “AI-generated” submissions.

Under the updated guidelines, an investigation by ArXiv moderators can lead to rejection of the submission and suspension of posting privileges for one year if there is “incontrovertible evidence” that the authors did not check the results produced by LLMs. Dietterich said such evidence includes problems like fabricated or hallucinated references, nonsensical citations, and direct copy-and-paste errors from language models, as well as “metacomments” that show prompts or generic text left in by the system.

The policy does not ban the use of AI tools outright. Instead, it emphasizes author responsibility for the final content submitted to the platform, regardless of how it was produced. Dietterich wrote, If generative AI tools...