High Court quashes unlawful warrants used at Andrew’s homes

Thames Valley Police accepted that search warrants used at Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s homes were unlawful, and the High Court quashed them. Newly disclosed court filings show that officers sought the warrants because they feared access could be delayed while permission was sought from the King, risking the loss of evidence. The criminal investigation continues, and a separate court hearing on whether police may retain seized material is expected in 2027. In its warrant application, the force told a judge that Andrew or his representatives might argue the Sandringham property belonged to King Charles and that separate legal permission was needed to enter. Officers said they could not be certain they would be allowed access without a warrant, and that seeking consent could delay searches and frustrate their purpose. They also raised the possibility that Andrew or his legal team would ask to see judicial authority before allowing entry. The application said police wanted documentary material, including paperwork, diaries and business records relating to Andrew’s time as the UK’s Special Representative for Trade and Investment, as well as electronic devices. Investigators said...